|
"ALLERGIES," A WORLD WITHOUT LOVE, PART I
Presenting a Solution to the Problem of "Allergies"
by Chester P. Yozwick, Nutritional Analyst
(PhD., Holistic Practitioner)
How would you like to live in a barren wilderness, devoid of all animals,
fruits, vegetables, beautiful flowers, plants, and other vegetation? If everyone
suffered with "allergies" and used the medical method of dealing with them--eliminating
all "allergens"--the world would be a veritable wasteland, devoid of all of its
natural beauty.
How the "Experts" Deal With "Allergies"
One of the "modern" ways of dealing with the problem of "allergies" is to remove the so-called offenders. If you are getting a reaction from your cat, get rid of it! If you are reacting to strawberries, don't eat them! If you get weak after eating
eggplant, don't eat it! If plants and flowers make you sneeze, get them out of the house!
Now the medics and biochemical "experts" have even gone as far as inventing
the autogenous vaccine made from the microorganisms of the person's own urine
to desensitize and combat "allergies." The problem with this is that it doesn't
deal with the cause or remove it. Dr. Michael Grieco, professor of clinical medicine
at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, says:
"Urine injection is potentially dangerous because it may stimulate the body's
immunological defense system to destroy the patient's kidney tissue." Also, this
vaccine contains cytocide, an agent that is destructive to cells. Like the other
vaccines, this one appears to be another biochemical manipulation decorated with
a fancy and flowery name, designed to remove money from the victim, rather than
"allergies." 
The medical definition for allergy in general is "a condition of unusual or exaggerated specific susceptibility to a substance which is harmless in similar amounts for the majority of members of the same species." A lot of double talk, but in short what
they are saying is that not everybody is allergic. Why is one person allergic and another not? Medical "authorities" now say "Allergy is due to failure of one of the normal defense mechanisms of the body."
Why does the defense mechanism of one fail while that of another does not? (ED: Allergy is overdefensiveness rather than underdefensiveness.)
The Asthmatic has to some extent learned what odors or irritants must be avoided.
Some sufferers will not even look at a simple primrose. Some people are "allergic"
to strawberries and other fruits; some to certain vegetables, others to the foods
of the nightshade family; and still another group to the pollen of plants and
beautiful flowers, along with certain seafoods and milk. What is wrong with these
various foods that they seem capable of causing so much havoc to so many? Is it
that these articles are not good food, or that the pollens of the plant are a
heinous evil? Granted, some of the foregoing foods mentioned are not fit for human
consumption, but what about the good nutritious ones? Let the victim be cognizant
of the fact that the pollens, the hair of animals, and other substances such as
food to which he is sensitive or "allergic" are normal elements of his environment.
Only when he realizes that his sensitivity to them must be due to something within
himself will he arrive at the cause. All of these elements are sources of allergic
annoyance to only those who are sick. Healthy people are not "allergic."
Right Eating is the Key to Overcoming Allergies
It shouldn't be any more difficult for every intelligent person to recognize
what humans should eat than it is to recognize what the bear, the beaver, the
gorilla, or giraffe should eat. We know that in nature there are specific foods
for humans as surely as for birds, beasts, and bees. All the requirements of life
and health for humans are  readily
available, just as they are for the beasts of the fields and birds of the air.
Humans, as part of nature, are at least as well adapted to a healthy and "allergy"-free
life on the earth as any other creature.
It is without question that wild animals are never sick if left in their
natural state. It is only when they have been domesticated; when they have been
estranged from nature; or when humans have intervened and upset their environment
that they become sick and suffer various disorders. Humans, on the contrary, suffer
with a wide variety of disorders, including "allergies," which are unknown to
animals in their natural state.
Taking the foregoing facts into consideration, and making an observation
of various tribes of long-living and disease-free people such as the wandering
Israelites, the Hunzas, the Equadorians, the White Caucasian Russians, and so
forth, it is plain to see that they are eating primarily those foods to which
humans are biologically adapted--fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds. Also, they
do not eat much of unnatural foods (animal foods, processed and refined foods,
spicy or salted foods, etc.), and they rarely utilize physicians and drugs. In
addition, exercise and fresh air are major parts of their daily lives.
When making a comparison of humans to other animals, we find that humans
most closely resemble, anatomically, the anthropoid ape, a frugivore living of
fruits, nuts, and seeds. It is scientifically and strongly evidenced, both in
history and in our present time, that partaking of foods just as they occur in
nature is the only sane dietary observance natural to humans for the sustenance
of life and health.
Look in the next issue of Vibrations for
"ALLERGIES, A WORLD WITHOUT LOVE Part II".
[
Bulletin Board ]
[
Main Contents ]
[
Issue Contents ]
[
Reflections
] [
Graduation ]
[
Travels ]
[ Presidential Message ]
|